This blog is intended to go along with Population: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues, by John R. Weeks, published by Cengage Learning. The latest edition is the 12th (it came out in 2015), but this blog is meant to complement any edition of the book by showing the way in which demographic issues are regularly in the news.

If you are a user of my textbook and would like to suggest a blog post idea, please email me at: john.weeks@sdsu.edu

Sunday, September 7, 2014

The Demographics of This Year's Congressional Elections

President Obama was featured this morning on Chuck Todd's first week of hosting "Meet the Press" on NBC, and one of his talking points was the hope that Democrats can hang onto their slim majority in the Senate. More certain, however, is that Republicans will retain their majority of the House of Representatives, as Nate Cohen on Upshot noted in today's NYTimes. His take on this is based largely on demographics.
How is it possible that the Democrats, who have won the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections, are at such a disadvantage in the House, theoretically the most representative body of government? It is the biggest paradox in American electoral politics.
Democrats often blame gerrymandering, but that’s not the whole story. More than ever, the kind of place where Americans live — metropolitan or rural — dictates their political views. The country is increasingly divided between liberal cities and close-in suburbs, on one hand, and conservative exurbs and rural areas, on the other. Even in red states, the counties containing the large cities — like Dallas, Atlanta, St. Louis and Birmingham — lean Democratic.
While acknowledging the role of gerrymandering, which I discuss in the forthcoming 12th Edition as being the most likely explanation for what is going on, Cohen suggests that congressional districts represented by Democrats have a higher fraction of democrats than the districts of Republicans have Republicans. This allows Republicans to win close races out in the suburbs, exurbs and rural areas while Democrats win landslides in the cities. This could easily be a doctoral dissertation because there are a lot of variables in play. Keep in mind, though, that 81 percent of the US population lives within the boundaries of a metropolitan area, and since members of Congress all have the same number of constituents (currently a bit more than 700,000), it is impossible for the exurbs and rural populations to be driving the bus when it comes to elections for the House of Representatives.

1 comment:

  1. More on Japan, in case you are interested. Sad to see this incentive for moving to the country was not more successful...

    http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/japan-s-demographic-crisis-free-cows-to-reverse-shrinking-population-588324

    ReplyDelete