This blog is intended to go along with Population: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues, by John R. Weeks, published by Cengage Learning. The latest edition is the 12th (it came out in 2015), but this blog is meant to complement any edition of the book by showing the way in which demographic issues are regularly in the news.

If you are a user of my textbook and would like to suggest a blog post idea, please email me at: john.weeks@sdsu.edu

Saturday, January 3, 2015

Can We Feed the World in the Future?

This week's Economist has a story on the value of land and its relationship to our ability to grow enough food to feed future populations. The article starts off this way:
IN THE next 40 years, humans will need to produce more food than they did in the previous 10,000 put together. But with sprawling cities gobbling up arable land, agricultural productivity gains decreasing, and demand for biofuels increasing, supply is not keeping up with demand. Clever farmers, scientists and entrepreneurs are bursting with ideas. But they need money to make this jump.

Financiers more often found buying and selling companies have cottoned on to the opportunity. Farm gates have traditionally been closed to capital markets: nine in ten farms are held by families. But demography is forcing a shift: the average age of farmers in Europe, America and New Zealand is now in the late fifties. They often have no successor, because offspring do not want to farm or cannot afford to buy out family members. In addition, adopting new technologies and farming at ever-greater scale require the sort of capital few farmers have, even after years of bumper crop prices.
So, demography is key here in two ways--population pressure on the food supply, and the aging of farmers in the more developed countries. But what about that blockbuster first sentence? Is it really true that "in the next 40 years, humans will need to produce more food than they did in the previous 10,000 put together."? Before making my own back of the envelope calculations, I checked the comments on the story to see if anyone had questioned this claim. No one had--all who commented apparently accepted it is as fact. 

The calculation is pretty straightforward: average population per year times average calories per day times days per year times the number of years in question:

For the next 40 years, the average projected population by the UN Population Division is 8.7 billion per year. In Table 11.3 of the 12th edition I provide data from the FAO showing that the average food consumption in the world is about 2,830 calories per day. Assuming those numbers, we get a demand figure of 3.6E+17 for the next 40 years. For the past 10,000 years we obviously know less. Looking at Figure 2.2 in the 12th edition we can make a rough calculation that the average world population over the past 10,000 years was 100 million (going from 4 million in -8000 to 7.3 billion in 2014). Even if we assume a desperation level diet of 1,500 calories per day year per person, that produces a demand figure of 5.5E+17--well above the figure for the next 40 years. So, I'm not sure where the numbers come from for that beginning sentence. At the same time, this does not diminish the task at hand, and it is my guess that investors buying land for the purpose of making money, rather than growing food, is not likely to end well.

I note that the Economist Group is hosting a conference on "Feeding the World 2015" in Amsterdam in February. Perhaps we will have more insight after that.

1 comment:

  1. Prof Weeks - another one of the wonderful "disconnects". :-)

    Conceivably we could invent some sort of "artificial food" to help a hungry world. Perhaps some horrendous new food item made from vitamins, old cardboard boxes and petrochemicals. Something with the consistency of plastic cornflakes - but with just enough nutritional content to allow an adult man to work for one day. Maybe. It would take a lot of factories, though, to produce all of these plastic cornflakes to feed a global population at the level of 9-10 billion people.

    More likely, the "fortunate few" in the world will continue to eat hamburgers, pork chow mein and sip on their red Merlot. While at the same time a growing number of people will eat one meal a day and have hungry bellies. When populations starve, they have a tendency to riot and create revolutions. It seems "baked into the cake" that we will be living in a world where we see many riots and revolutions in the future.

    Can we already see this trend happening today? How about the "Arab Spring" and the rise of ISIS? There were politics behind the Arab Spring certainly, but in the end it's primarily because many Middle East governments are NOT meeting the basic needs of their people. As for ISIS, yes they are certainly a very nasty bunch of villains. But the fact is that the number of "terrorists" in the world today is a drop in the bucket - compared to the number of pirates, warlords and terrorists we will have in another 30 years. Because, simply put, hungry people DO desperate things!

    We cannot really solve this problem without seriously revamping our global economic system. Are we willing to do this???

    cheers,
    Pete, Redondo Beach

    ReplyDelete