This blog is intended to go along with Population: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues, by John R. Weeks, published by Cengage Learning. The latest edition is the 12th (it came out in 2015), but this blog is meant to complement any edition of the book by showing the way in which demographic issues are regularly in the news.

If you are a user of my textbook and would like to suggest a blog post idea, please email me at: john.weeks@sdsu.edu

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Election Demographics Are Heating Up

Nate Silver made a name for himself during the 2008 election with his 538 blog, named for the number of electoral votes there are in the United States, of which one more than half is required to win the presidency. Under his banner, the New York Times has inaugurated a blog in which the electoral demographics of each state will be analyzed. They started this week with New Mexico. In 2000, Gore squeaked out a narrow win, and then in 2004 Bush squeaked out a narrow win. But in 2008 Obama took it by a wide margin.

New Mexico has grown more Democratic as its Hispanic population has increased. Hispanics make up 46 percent of the state’s population. Mr. Bush was competitive there partly because he did well among Hispanic voters, winning 44 percent in 2004. In 2008, by contrast, Senator John McCain of Arizona won just 30 percent of the Hispanic vote.
Spanish-speaking enclaves in northern New Mexico trace their heritage back to the Spanish explorers of the 1500s, and many families have been American citizens for generations. As a result, Hispanic turnout tends to be higher in the north than in southwest New Mexico, where recent immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America are more common.
Beyond the growing Latino population, Mr. Obama’s margin in New Mexico was helped by the state’s large American Indian presence, which is 10 percentof New Mexico’s population and which was determinedly courted by the Obama campaign in 2008.
New Mexico might be even more Democratic if not for idiosyncratic Albuquerque, the state’s only real metropolis. One reason Albuquerque might be more politically competitive than other big cities, Ms. Sierra said, is that nearly one-fourth of its workers are employed by the government, and many of those jobs are defense-related. Sandia National Laboratories and Kirtland Air Force Base are both in Albuquerque.
I would argue that government workers are likely to have a vested interest in the current administration, which was Bush in 2004 (and he won) and Obama in 2012, whereas in 2000 and 2008 neither candidate was an incumbent, and in both instances a Democrat won the state. So, it may be that government workers are the true swing voters in New Mexico.
The Bottom Line
Mr. Obama is a 92 percent favorite in New Mexico, according to the current FiveThirtyEight forecast. The model projects the president will receive 55 percent to Mr. Romney’s 44 percent, an 11-point margin. That would be a closer race — if not exactly close — compared to 2008.

No comments:

Post a Comment